Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucdavis.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ucdavis!ccs020 From: ccs020@ucdavis.UUCP (Kevin Chu) Newsgroups: net.news,net.misc,net.flame Subject: Re: USENET frowning upon graphics in signatures Message-ID: <152@ucdavis.UUCP> Date: Wed, 16-Oct-85 00:07:39 EDT Article-I.D.: ucdavis.152 Posted: Wed Oct 16 00:07:39 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 17-Oct-85 01:18:48 EDT References: <491@scirtp.UUCP> <454@bdmrrr.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: University of California, Davis Lines: 37 Xref: watmath net.news:4065 net.misc:8678 net.flame:12334 > > > most definitely frowned upon. DO NOT include drawings, pictures, > > > maps, or other graphics in your signature -- it is not the > > > appropriate place for such material and viewed as rude by > > > other readers. > > > > I fail to see the harm in including a (concise) graphic at the > > end of a posting. [...] > > > > ||||||| > > [ O-O ] Todd Jones > > \ ^ / {decvax,akgua}!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp!todd > > |___| SCI Systems Inc. doesn't necessarily agree with Todd. > > > > See, now it's only four lines. Is that any less offensive? > > Boy I'm with you Todd. Signature files with graphics help me recognize > those who posted articles. [...] > -- > /\ /\ > / \/^\ /\ /\/\/\ /^\ /\ /^/\^\ /\ > Al Gates\^/ \/\ / \/ \/\/ \/\ / ^ \/ \^^^\ > BDM Corporation \/\ /^\ / {seismo,rlgvax}!bdmrrr!gates \ /\ \ > 7915 Jones Branch Drive\/ \ \ / \ / \ \ > McLean, Virginia 22102 \ \ \/ \/ \ \ > \ \ \^^\ I also support graphics in .signatures as long as they aren't longer than a normal .signature. Creativity and humor shouldn't be censored, they should be enjoyed by all. (After all this, I have a boring .signature) -- --Kevin Chu ..ucbvax!ucdavis!vega!ccs020 /ex