Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site tulane.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!akgub!tulane!kpc
From: kpc@tulane.UUCP (Kevin Centanni)
Newsgroups: net.physics,net.research,net.misc
Subject: Newman's Energy Machine (2)
Message-ID: <175@tulane.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 17-Oct-85 02:11:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: tulane.175
Posted: Thu Oct 17 02:11:34 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Oct-85 06:19:07 EDT
Reply-To: kpc@tulane.UUCP (Kevin Centanni)
Organization: Tulane University, Dept. of Computer Science
Lines: 60
Xref: watmath net.physics:3384 net.research:270 net.misc:8699


   Since my initial posting of a message entitled "The Energy Machine of
Joseph Newman", I have received over 30 messages regarding this energy
machine.  Most of these were along the lines of "a sucker born every
minute"... there were some replies from people with an open mind who
were at least willing to listen to the facts concerning this machine...
those are the ones with true scientific minds.   I, too, when first hearing
about this man in the backwoods of Mississippi who had invented "some sort
of perpetual motion machine", gawked at the idea.  But then I learned some
of the more truthful ideas and principles behind this man and his energy
machine.  First,  this is NOT a perpetual motion machine... the output
cannot be re-directed into the input and the machine run iteslf!  Clearly,
anyone who knows about Newton's laws of conservation of energy will realize
that things like that are just not possible.  In reality, the machine does
produce "greater external energy output than external energy input."  A
simple equation that can explain the machine is:
   Small, Catalytic, Electrical, EXTERNAL Energy Input (from batteries)
                            +
Very Large INTERNAL Energy (released via a conversion of matter to energy
                            in accordance with Einstein's equation of E=MC^2)
                            =
    EXTERNAL ENERGY OUTPUT (electrical and/or mechnical)

   I may have been incorrect in some of the assumptions that I made in regard
to how much power it takes to light florescent tubes... here is some more
factual data that was found in Newman's book:
"On September 19, 1985 the motor was operated at 1,000 and 2,000 volts
 battery input, with output powers of 50 and 200 Watts respectively.  Input
 power in these tests were 7 and 14 Watts, yielding efficiencies of
 700% and 1,400% respectively."
   It should be noted that at this demonstration of Newman's energy machine,
there WERE oscilliscopes and multimeters hooked up to the machine... they
WERE confirming the earlier reports that Newman had released.  To this day,
every scientist who has actually has an open enough mind to independently
test Newman's machine has come to the conclusion that, yes, the machine does
indeed work.  Many (including myself) do not understand exactly HOW the
machine works... I'm desperately trying to figure that out now.  But, I can
pretty much assume that, in 1985, in front of 100's of cameras and video
equipment, and in a room with 1000's of scientists and other skeptics, Mr.
Newman couldn't merely hide an AC outlet under the platform and expect to
get away with it.
   For those interested, Joseph Newman's book information is:
       "The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman"
       ISBN : 0-9613835-1-8
       Library of Congress Catalogue Card No.: 84-90652
         The Joseph Newman Publishing Company
         Route 1, Box 52
         Lucedale, Mississippi 39452
         8 1/2" x 11", 287 pages, 167 illustrations, 15 photographs
         $34.95 + 3.50 Shipping and Handling

I have no ties with the above company... these views are my own and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the university.

                                  Kevin P. Centanni
                                  {akgua,ulysses,ihnp4}!tulane!kpc

" Either I'm a fool...
                        or all of you are. "