Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site ISM780.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!bbnccv!ISM780!dianeh From: dianeh@ISM780.UUCP Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: Still More on Totally Bad Movies Message-ID: <31600022@ISM780.UUCP> Date: Thu, 10-Oct-85 19:15:00 EDT Article-I.D.: ISM780.31600022 Posted: Thu Oct 10 19:15:00 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 14-Oct-85 03:43:58 EDT References: <346@cylixd.UUCP> Lines: 65 Nf-ID: #R:cylixd:-34600:ISM780:31600022:000:3124 Nf-From: ISM780!dianeh Oct 10 19:15:00 1985 >The list of Totally Bad Movies, as of 10/7/85, stands at: > >... >*Candy >*Deal of the Century >... > Felicity >*Zelig >(Asterisk means new nomination.) >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >...Please, can anyone out there say ANYTHING good about >ANY of these movies? I need your help in shortening the list. > >Following is a summary of the mail I received in support of the >new nominations. > >1) Zelig - boring, boring, boring, and damn disappointing, too. Couldn't disagree more. This film was innovative -- the matching of old footage and incorporating Allen into it was extremely well done -- and the story was funny and poignant. >4) Deal Of The Century - Never have so many who were so funny been so boring. Wrong, wrong. This has actually become one of my favorite films. I didn't see it at the theater because of the way it was originally marketed -- (See Chevy Chase be a buffoon in the `Wonderful World of Arms Dealing'-- so I was pleasantly surprised when I saw it on cable. I've since seen it 3 more times and like it more each time. Chevy Chase actually gets good direction and *acts* instead of just being a pratfall, one-liner comedian. Gregory Hines is great, and Sigourney Weaver has some good scenes. >6) Candy - directed by Roman Polanski. Interesting from a historical point of > view, to illustrate the differences between late '60s soft-porn in Europe > and America...Candy is a classic European sex flick of its time - set in > a villa, this young girl comes in after a rainy night, having to fend off > a truck driver. Sex scene consists of girl taking her clothes off very > slowly and admiring herself in the mirror, then semi- playing with > herself. Rest of movie she is chased around the villa by a bunch of half- > wit pseudo-Fellini-esque characters who play bridge, ping-pong in their > underwear, and wear dresses over their spaghetti-stained undershirts. > Poor, poor dubbing. Worse acting. Makes chop-socky look well-produced. > Movie has no ending - Candy just walks out of the villa. Probably the > best existentialist statement Polanski could muster up." > - Davis Tucker It's a good thing you gave a description of *this* particular 'Candy'. At first I thought you were talking about the ``classic'' with Richard Burton, John Astin, Marlon Brando (``You can't bring a frozen guru into California!''), et. al. -- definitely one of my all-time favorites. Never heard of *this* one, though, so you may be right -- as long as a clear distinction is made, please. I have to agree with 'Felicity' (at least the R-rated version shown recently on Showtime). It's hard to imagine that the X-rated version had any redeeming qualities, though, unless you consider X-rated scenes redeeming. Really, it's true about their using the same ``local color'' footage over and over and over again. Except I think the estimate of 5 times may be too small; personally, I think it accounted for at least half the running time of the film -- at least it sure *seemed* that way at the time! Diane Holt Interactive Systems Corp. ima!ism780