Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site dataioDataio.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!uw-june!entropy!dataio!bright
From: bright@dataioDataio.UUCP (Walter Bright)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Jagged Edge spoiler
Message-ID: <842@dataioDataio.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-Oct-85 12:49:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: dataioDa.842
Posted: Wed Oct 23 12:49:59 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 24-Oct-85 08:23:13 EDT
References: <211@vi.ri.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: bright@dataio.UUCP (Walter Bright
Organization: Data I/O Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 25

In article <211@vi.ri.cmu.edu> heyse@vi.ri.cmu.edu (Donnell Heyse) writes:
>
>	Warning...Warning...Wanring...Warning...Warning
>
>	This whole message is a spoiler so don't read any of this if you
>haven't seen this movie and still want to.  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Who saw the movie and is absolutely positive about who the
>killer was supposed to be?

I saw it and am absolutely positive that the face was that of Jeff Bridges.
I know it's him because he's wearing the same weird expression he did
when he died in 'Thunderbolt and Lightfoot'.

By the way, one thing bugs me a lot about the ending. If Jeff was such a
smart, calculating murderer, why did he so stupidly go after his lawyer
in the end? He had already been aquitted, and could not be tried again.
He was home free, no matter what new evidence turned up.