Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!seismo!harvard!think!mit-eddie!nessus
From: nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (Doug Alan)
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: Suzanne Vega
Message-ID: <128@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 18-Oct-85 09:32:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.128
Posted: Fri Oct 18 09:32:30 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 21-Oct-85 00:38:23 EDT
References: <599@tellab1.UUCP> <5420@mit-eddie.UUCP> <618@tellab1.UUCP> <5651@fortune.UUCP> <80@mit-eddie.UUCP> <1500@utcsri.UUCP>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 17

> From: elf@utcsri.UUCP (Eugene Fiume)

>> [Me:] ...............  And both Suzanne Vega and Kate Bush are much
>> better than Joni Mitchell!  (Sorry, Joni...)

> Either this is a poor joke or Doug has once again demonstrated his
> ignorance and arrogance.  I'll assume the former unless Doug chooses to
> complete the demonstration.

> "much better" indeed.  What the hell is THAT supposed to mean?

Foo!  Go away.  It's called "personal opinion".  And if you think Joni
Mitchell is better is better than SV or KB that's fine with me.  (Though
you'd be wrong!)

				-Doug Alan
				  nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (or ARPA)