Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!seismo!harvard!think!mit-eddie!nessus
From: nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (Doug Alan)
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: The secret history of the headgear microphone
Message-ID: <152@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 20-Oct-85 15:46:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.152
Posted: Sun Oct 20 15:46:44 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 22-Oct-85 06:44:39 EDT
References: <1437@utcsri.UUCP> <5421@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 30

> From: oleg@birtch.UUCP (Oleg Kiselev x268)

>> So Love and Rockets are both Godley and Creme
>> influenced and Kate Bush influenced....
>> 				 Doug Alan

> Oh, come off it! I believe Kate Bush is one of the greatest female vocalists 
> alive, BUT BE REASONABLE!!!!

Eh hem!  She's quite more important than just as a "vocalist".

> Why is it that any time someone produces a good piece of work you yell
> "Kate Bush influence!" ?

I do???

> Don't you believe some people have thier own talents?

I don't recall implying otherwise.

My only comment was that Love And Rockets is influenced by Kate Bush and
Godley and Creme insofaras use of a certain microphone and a certain
gizmo is an influence.  Nothing more.  And I certainly wouldn't claim
that that influence is particularly incredibly important.

Why is that anytime anyone makes a silly innocuous comment, someone else
has to make a big fuss over it?

				-Doug Alan
				  nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (or ARPA)