Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: "Hounds of Love" at number one!
Message-ID: <1946@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-Oct-85 12:10:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.1946
Posted: Wed Oct 23 12:10:59 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 24-Oct-85 08:13:06 EDT
References: <5410@mit-eddie.UUCP> <2304@sjuvax.UUCP> <76@mit-eddie.UUCP> <2389@sjuvax.UUCP>
Distribution: net.music
Organization: Whatever we're calling ourselves this week
Lines: 43
Keywords: Kate Bush  (What else ?!?!)

>>And what makes you think that the same people that buy Madonna albums
>>buy Kate Bush albums?  I'd say the intersection is relatively small  [NESSUS]

>              ... (here we go again) because you remind me of a good
>          deal of the Madonna fans I know...(off into the sunset)  [PALENA]

>>considering that Kate Bush does wonderful intelligent art rock and
>>Madonna does awful mindless insulting formula pop dreck.

>               .. ahhhh,art rock...

>         I don't care if Kate Bush holds orgies at David Gilmour's home,
>         and don't care to speculate what she'd do at Page's house...

>    (that title just reeks of intelligence)

>>	In Malta, catch a swallow
>>	For all of the guilty to set them free
>>	Wings fill the window, and they beat and bleed
>>	They hold the sky on the other side
>>	Of borderlines

>          ...this sounds like a piece of verse that a friend of mine 
>      handed in as a creative writing assignment in senior year of high-
>      school.Any copyright lawyers out there ??!!...

>       ...(this is the killer folks) all I've made my mind up about is
>     that you are an ignorant net-hog who seems to think that I've got
>     nothing better to do than 'n' my way past articles about Kate Bush.

Has anyone figured out what Palena's problem is?  Did anything he said here
make any sense?  Copyright lawyers?  "Ahh, art rock"?  Given that Palena's
opinions on Led Zeppelin as god have been no different from Doug Alan's
opinions about Kate Bush in the same role, what's the point?  Must he tar
everything he doesn't like, while whining about how a criticism of a mediocre
performance by his "idols" is some sort of vicious attack?  Go back to putting
your headphones on and listening to Kashmir with the lights out if this is
what you have to offer.  (I wonder what the group would be like if Palena
had his way and posted only Zeppelin articles to this newsgroup [instead of
"only" Bush articles]...)
-- 
"There!  I've run rings 'round you logically!"
"Oh, intercourse the penguin!"			Rich Rosen    ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr