Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site trwrdc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!seismo!trwrdc!frith
From: frith@trwrdc.UUCP (Lord Frith)
Newsgroups: net.music.synth
Subject: Re: Comments/Questions from a new DX-7 owner
Message-ID: <1074@trwrdc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 17-Oct-85 07:07:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: trwrdc.1074
Posted: Thu Oct 17 07:07:11 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Oct-85 20:24:09 EDT
References: <1199@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Reply-To: frith@trwrdc.UUCP (Lord Frith)
Distribution: na
Organization: TRW Advanced Technology Facility, Merrifield VA.
Lines: 19

In article <1199@vax1.fluke.UUCP> brad@fluke.UUCP (Brad Srebnik) writes:
> Well, I've had my DX-7 for a week now, and I have some comments and questions.
> In general, I'm EXTREMELY happy with it.  As far as imitating real instruments
> goes, the number of believable impressions is quite high.  I'm probably 
> forgetting some, but the pre-set harp, harpsichord, harmonica, bells (and
> whistles, too), bass, horn, snare drum, xylophone and pipe organ are VERY good.
> The piano isn't too bad, and it's the best I remember hearing for a synth in
> the $US1000-2000 price range.

How does the quality of the CX5M compare to that of the DX-7?  Is there
more or less flexibility with the CX5M (I suspect more)?
-- 

seismo!trwrdc!root				- Lord Frith

"And I want you"
"And I want you"
"And I want you so"
"It's an obsession"