Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site Glacier.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!nsc!Glacier!reid
From: reid@Glacier.ARPA (Brian Reid)
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: Re: Stanford now gatewaying fa.*?
Message-ID: <13482@Glacier.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 22-Oct-85 03:14:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: Glacier.13482
Posted: Tue Oct 22 03:14:04 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Oct-85 05:34:40 EDT
References: <5208@amdcad.UUCP>
Reply-To: reid@Glacier.UUCP (Brian Reid)
Organization: Stanford University, Computer Systems Lab
Lines: 15

>Can we come to a consensus on this matter? Or are Stanford and
>Berkeley going to fight it out regardless of the impact on the rest of
>the USENET community?

Sorry, this was a 1-keystroke typo on my part when I went to edit our sys
files so that the new mod groups don't get passed through. I hadn't noticed
it, but upon reading your message I found and fixed the "fa" leak.
We have been gatewaying the "fa" stuff for a couple of years, and have
always in the past managed to contain it; the complexity arose because
Berkeley is not gatewaying fa.risks, and we are, and I had to make sure that
fa.risks got out and the others didn't, and I blew it.  Sorry.
(Please let me know soon if this fix doesn't work)
-- 
	Brian Reid	decwrl!glacier!reid
	Stanford	reid@SU-Glacier.ARPA