Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 from ihnp4 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site chinet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!bellcore!petrus!sabre!zeta!epsilon!gamma!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!chinet!price
From: price@chinet.UUCP (Douglas H. Price)
Newsgroups: net.news.b
Subject: problem with Rnmail and 2.10.3
Message-ID: <201@chinet.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 8-Oct-85 18:35:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: chinet.201
Posted: Tue Oct  8 18:35:05 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 11-Oct-85 07:06:47 EDT
Reply-To: price@chinet.UUCP (Doug Price)
Distribution: net
Organization: chinet, Public Access UN*X, Chicago IL
Lines: 13
Keywords: netnews 2.10.3 rn

There seems to be an imcompatability between rn's Rnmail and netnews 2.10.3.
Both Rnmail and recmail in 2.10.3 append the .signature file, leading to some
of the double signature articles we have been seeing on the net of late.

In addition, Rnmail creates and passes empty Bcc: and Cc: lines to recmail.
I have a sneaking suspicion that these fields are causing the generation of
dead letters on replies from rn with news 2.10.3.  Any ideas of which to fix?
Rn or recmail?

-- 
							Douglas H. Price
							chinet Chicago IL
							..!ihnp4!chinet!price