Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site Shasta.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!amdahl!nsc!pyramid!decwrl!Glacier!Shasta!sankar
From: sankar@Shasta.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.nlang.india
Subject: previous message
Message-ID: <754@Shasta.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 4-Oct-85 12:59:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: Shasta.754
Posted: Fri Oct  4 12:59:00 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 7-Oct-85 03:47:09 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 6

A disastrous typo in my previous message!  The first line went

None of the people I know are for *NOT* receiving dowry

The second *NOT* was **NOT** supposed to be there, it changes the meaning
of the sentence.