Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site oddjob.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!gargoyle!oddjob!matt
From: matt@oddjob.UUCP (Matt Crawford)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy,net.math
Subject: Re: Sc--nce Attack (really on minds and computers)
Message-ID: <1006@oddjob.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 21-Oct-85 17:00:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: oddjob.1006
Posted: Mon Oct 21 17:00:31 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Oct-85 04:07:22 EDT
References: <299@umich.UUCP> <10699@ucbvax.ARPA> <10700@ucbvax.ARPA> <10702@ucbvax.ARPA>
Reply-To: matt@oddjob.UUCP (Matt Crawford)
Distribution: net
Organization: U. Chicago, Astronomy & Astrophysics
Lines: 9
Keywords: Turing machines vs. the mind
Xref: watmath net.philosophy:2902 net.math:2408

In article <10702@ucbvax.ARPA> tedrick@ucbernie.UUCP (Tom Tedrick) writes:
>
>*IS THERE ANYONE THAT AGREES WITH ME THAT THE HUMAN MIND IS PROVABLY
> NOT EQUIVALENT TO A TURING MACHINE?*

Sure, I agree with you.  A Turing machine has unlimited memory.
_____________________________________________________
Matt		University	crawford@anl-mcs.arpa
Crawford	of Chicago	ihnp4!oddjob!matt