Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hou2g!scott
From: scott@hou2g.UUCP (Colonel'K)
Newsgroups: net.physics,net.misc,net.research
Subject: Re: Joseph Newman's Energy Machine
Message-ID: <679@hou2g.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 17-Oct-85 10:37:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: hou2g.679
Posted: Thu Oct 17 10:37:51 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Oct-85 03:42:20 EDT
References: <162@ccnysci.UUCP>
Organization: A Rent-Controlled Gothic Mansion
Lines: 22
Xref: watmath net.physics:3379 net.misc:8692 net.research:267


>>>was actually putting out more energy than it was taking in... the energy
>>>being generated by the machine was coming directly for the conversion of
>>>copper to energy (E=MC^2).  Needless to say, I was very intrigued.

>>if this is true, how about a measurement of the weight of the copper after
>>a test of some duration?  There should be quite measurable changes in weight.

>This is not a good test, if the machine works by converting the copper to
>energy, because the amount of mass required for a few watts is very small
>(C**2 is a big number) and so this measurement would be prone to error.
>How about measuring power capacities of the batteries and comparing to the
>power output of the machine?

How about just rigging some sort of feed back and disconnecting the 
batteries, then finding out how long the lights still work?


			Sounds like a pigment of your immigration,

			Scott J. Berry