Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!yale!inmet!janw
From: janw@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Nicaraguan Parallel: Some ke
Message-ID: <7800494@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 9-Oct-85 21:55:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: inmet.7800494
Posted: Wed Oct  9 21:55:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Oct-85 06:30:22 EDT
References: <720@whuxl.UUCP>
Lines: 21
Nf-ID: #R:whuxl:-72000:inmet:7800494:000:842
Nf-From: inmet!janw    Oct  9 21:55:00 1985


/* ---------- "Re: Re: Nicaraguan Parallel: Some k" ---------- */
> All I can say Tim is, if it walks like a duck, if it quacks
> like a duck.......	 T. C. Wheeler

> So when are we invading Mexico and India as "hotbeds  of  Marxist
> totalitarianaism"?
> Too bad we missed the opportunity to invade Daley's Chicago ...
>                    tim sevener  whuxl!orb

Neither the Mexican ruling party, nor the Indian one,  is  monol-
ithic.*)    This    is  what  preserves their other liberties. Of
course, neither nation is totalitarian (nor  Marxist,  but   this
is  less  important).  Nicaragua is both... not that it should be
invaded. For now, let us just recognize a Contra government.

 However, your Chicago idea sounds nice ! :-)
______________
*) On party unity, see "The Foundations of Leninism", by Joseph Stalin.

		Jan Wasilewsky