Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!yale!inmet!janw From: janw@inmet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Re: Nicaraguan Parallel: Some key fa Message-ID: <7800580@inmet.UUCP> Date: Fri, 18-Oct-85 15:27:00 EDT Article-I.D.: inmet.7800580 Posted: Fri Oct 18 15:27:00 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 22-Oct-85 06:37:56 EDT References: <248@3comvax.UUCP> Lines: 60 Nf-ID: #R:3comvax:-24800:inmet:7800580:000:2579 Nf-From: inmet!janw Oct 18 15:27:00 1985 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 85 00:40:05 edt From: ihnp4!inmet!janw@UCB-VAX.Berkeley.EDU (Jan Wasilewsky) > Date: Mon, 30 Sep 85 10:33:22 PDT > From: upstill%ucbdegas@Berkeley.EDU (Steve Upstill) > > [ So, what are...[Nicaragua's large]...forces for, anyway? > ...JoSH ] > > An excellent question, one which has much troubled me. You, JoSH, > seem to feel that since there is no plausible explanation for their > numbers, they must be for attacking their neighbors. Logically, this is > an unsound implication. Add to it their early rhetoric about revolution without borders, and you get both tools and motive: they were out to carve out a Central American empire for themselves and their cause. Not opportunity, though: > You also feel that they would be useless in > defending against a determined attack by the United States; why then are > you so enthusiastic about their utility in attacking nations which the > US would surely leap to defend? When the revolution won, it was quite unclear what USA would do in such a crisis. Salvadoran situation seemed, to many, hopeless. Apparently, Ortega & his comrades waited for a moment that never came. > Sadly, I have to come to the conclusion that the militaristic nature > of the Nicaraguan state is the result of a paranoid mentality on the > part of the leadership. But as has been pointed out to me before, just > because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. And > the US is surely out to get Nicaragua. You mean out to get the regime in Managua. Yes, but it was not at first: it *helped* the bastards. And it was then that they created that bloated army. Paranoia, all right, but it can be a powerful tool of conquest - as many revolutionary wars in history will attest. > The simple fact is that the most powerful nation in the world is fuming > with hostility at a tiny, bankrupt but proud (read, uncooperative) neighbor. > Not being saints, the leadership has responded to this threat the way all > nations have responded to similar situations: with desperate militarism > and nationalism. Again: the "response" came before the threat. And many people feel that here is a "tiny, proud" tentacle of the Soviet squid. *That* beast is large; no shame in combatting it where you can. In any case, Contras are as Nicaraguan as are the Sandinistas; in helping them, we are *helping* a tiny neighbor. Was any outside help to Sandinistas against Somoza a cowardly attack on a small nation? If not, then sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander. Jan Wasilewsky