Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site vaxwaller.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!zehntel!varian!vaxwaller!chip From: chip@vaxwaller.UUCP (Chip Kozy) Newsgroups: net.rec.photo Subject: Re: Free Markets and Product Quality Message-ID: <349@vaxwaller.UUCP> Date: Tue, 8-Oct-85 12:53:05 EDT Article-I.D.: vaxwalle.349 Posted: Tue Oct 8 12:53:05 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 14-Oct-85 05:26:38 EDT References: <298@tekig4.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Varian, Walnut Creek, CA Lines: 35 *** REPLACE THIS WITH YOUR *** ........" But you could always count on Kodak. Now, it seems at least in photofinishing this is no longer true, and I worry that this malaise will spread to the other parts of Kodaks's empire as well. And that makes me wonder as to the cause, which leads me to postulating about increased competition from foreign producers." Being a color photographer without a darkroom, I've found myself at the mercy of the "big yellow", and I couldn't agree with you more!! The quality of Kodak developing and printing in the San Francisco Bay area has gone to the dogs. I used to be able to count on accurate color reproduction (especially when using a gray scale), but now I cannot be sure what I'll get...i.e. magenta skies, water spots, etc. I've complained to Rochester, and gotten the "there, there now. Here's a free roll of film, now be a nice boy and go play." letters back from them. My alternative was to use a local house which costs a bit more, but I have immediate control over what they do and don't do. I've found them extermely willing to listen and work with me, so I don't mind the few extra pennies it costs. As an aside, does anyone out there know how to get good sharp prints from 35MM slides? Anyway, back to the oars. Happiness; Chip -- Chip Kozy (415) 939-2400 x-2048 Varian Inst. Grp. 2700 Mitchell Dr. Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 {zehntel,amd,fortune,resonex,rtech}!varian!chip