Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utcsri.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsri!hofbauer
From: hofbauer@utcsri.UUCP (John Hofbauer)
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Subject: Re: Product Quality: Color prints from slides
Message-ID: <1505@utcsri.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 16-Oct-85 18:12:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: utcsri.1505
Posted: Wed Oct 16 18:12:15 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 16-Oct-85 18:44:21 EDT
References: <298@tekig4.UUCP> <349@vaxwaller.UUCP> <5746@tekecs.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Lines: 13

> I had always considered prints from slides to be inferior to
> prints from negatives *UNTIL* I discovered internegatives.

No disagreement here. In fact, I feel internegatives from Kodachrome
slides to be superior to a Kodacolour negative of the same size.

> Reversal color print processes are not as good as negative print
> processes. MY OPINION: Don't bother to flame if you disagree!

Ever hear of Cibachrome? The results are luminous. Furthermore the
dye stability is such that it won't fade when hung in a brightly
lit room. It is ONLY a positive-to-positive process, and VERY
expensive. Sigh!