Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rochester.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ray
From: ray@rochester.UUCP (Ray Frank)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.religion
Subject: Re: "Secular Humanism" banned in the US Schools.
Message-ID: <12288@rochester.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 12-Oct-85 11:23:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: rocheste.12288
Posted: Sat Oct 12 11:23:43 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 15-Oct-85 04:25:57 EDT
References: <11384@rochester.UUCP> <615@hou2g.UUCP> <143@ucdavis.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Rochester, CS Dept.
Lines: 18
Xref: linus net.politics:10800 net.religion:7568


> Mr. Barry forgot to add that creationism is *NOT* information. It's not even
> science. It's an unprovable idea.
> 
> 				Chris Young.

Black holes up there or down there in outer space cannot absolutely be proven.
But no one denies the right to teach about the possibilities of the existence
of black holes.  It is also not clear that the existence of black holes can
ever be proven.  What we do see is the effect of not the direct observance
of what might be black holes.  To draw parallels, what we observe in nature
is not necessarily God, but the effect God has had on nature, namely, creation-
ism.

I rest my case.

p.s.  Don't shoot this example down, there are a million more where this one
came from.  Science churns them out in unlimited quantities.