Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rabbit.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!alice!rabbit!wildman
From: wildman@rabbit.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.religion
Subject: Taxing non-prophet Organizations
Message-ID: <768@rabbit.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 18-Oct-85 17:14:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: rabbit.768
Posted: Fri Oct 18 17:14:58 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Oct-85 08:13:36 EDT
Organization: Rayne Forrest Ecological Association
Lines: 24
Xref: watmath net.politics:11568 net.religion:8006



My collegues and I don't see any question of fact in all of
this nonsense about taxation, and the like.  It's clear
to us that the law says that only non-prophet organizations
are to be taxed.

Jesus, Moses, and Mohammed were all prophets, or so some
believe.  Clearly, any organization that believes in a prophet
isn't a non-prophet organization, and thus can't have
special tax privelidges.

In case those of you who hadn't thought about it very
hard haven't realized, the founding fathers,
although wise and far-seeing, couldn't spell very well,
and they wrote "profit" where they meant "prophet" instead.

After all, if this is the promised land, then profit must
really mean prophet!
----
L. Greystoke, III

Rayne Forrest Ecological Association
lapin!rabbit!wildman