Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site akgua.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!rjb
From: rjb@akgua.UUCP (R.J. Brown [Bob])
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.religion
Subject: Re: "Secular Humanism" banned in the US Schools.
Message-ID: <1758@akgua.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-Oct-85 17:35:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: akgua.1758
Posted: Wed Oct 23 17:35:58 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 24-Oct-85 07:36:50 EDT
References: <788@cybvax0.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Technologies/Bell Labs, Atlanta
Lines: 11
Xref: watmath net.politics:11652 net.religion:8038


If my fragile understanding of Goedel can be explained,
I would say that in terms of systems you would need a
larger system to model a smaller one and have the smaller
one simulate any operations.  By definition the larger one
(God) would have complete "knowledge" of the smaller one.
Thus, God's omniscience would remain intact.  Does this get
me anywhere Mike ??  << Hey Rich, I not offering proof - I'm
speculating again >>

Bob Brown {...ihnp4!akgua!rjb}