Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!arnold From: arnold@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU (Kenneth C R C Arnold) Newsgroups: net.politics,net.religion.christian Subject: Re: School Prayer Message-ID: <10773@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Wed, 23-Oct-85 03:49:50 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.10773 Posted: Wed Oct 23 03:49:50 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 24-Oct-85 00:43:56 EDT References: <344@unc.unc.UUCP> Reply-To: arnold@ucbvax.UUCP (Kenneth C R C Arnold) Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 35 Xref: watmath net.politics:11648 net.religion.christian:1490 In article <344@unc.unc.UUCP> goodrum@unc.UUCP (Cloyd Goodrum) writes: >[Sheldon] Vanauken suggests that every public school in the country begin the >day with the words "God save the United States and this honorable school", >just as the Supreme Court begins its day with the words "God save the United >States and this honorable court". > >The court could do one of three things: > >(a) Rule that the practice is constitutional, since it is nearly identical >to the practice of the Supreme Court. > >(b) Admit that it had been mistakenly indulging in an unconstitutional >practice for years. > >(c) Rule that substituting the word "school" for "court" transforms the >invocation from a harmless piece of rhetoric into a prayer. (Which would take >a lot of fancy judicial prestidigitation.) > > Cloyd Goodrum III Or (d) Do what it would do, which is rule that adults are more capable of choosing their own beliefs than children, and are therefore in substantially less need of protection than children. Which is what they have based all their rulings on school prayer on. Has Mr. V. read one? Maybe he should before advising people to do the ridiculous in the name of alleged constitutionality. Not that I think opening US Gov't procedings in the name of God is constitutional either. But that isn't what they've been saying over the years, as anyone who payed attention to their actual opinions (rather than their own) might be able to figure out. Ken Arnold