Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site princeton.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!jsl
From: jsl@princeton.UUCP (Jong Lee)
Newsgroups: net.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: canesco(?), and the A's
Message-ID: <1121@princeton.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 17-Oct-85 13:50:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: princeto.1121
Posted: Thu Oct 17 13:50:35 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Oct-85 03:58:05 EDT
References: <1103@princeton.UUCP> <451@bdmrrr.UUCP> <1115@princeton.UUCP> <325@whuts.UUCP> <1120@princeton.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Princeton University EECS Dept
Lines: 55

> > FLAME ON!
> > I think you should try reading the B.S. you wrote that I just extracted
> > from your article. You just don't like Billy. In one sentence you say
> > good pitching always beats good hitting (very true!) and in the next you
> > can't understand why Billy didn't win with the likes of five mentioned 
> > players including the only starting pitcher the Yankees have worth mentioning.
> > If the Yankees had the pitching the O's have on their staff, the Jays along
> > with the rest of the AL East would have eaten Yankee dust. Get off of your
> > Hate Martin kick; you just can't recognize good managerial talent or anything
> > else for that matter. Watch where any team goes with Weaver or Martin at the
> > helm from the BEGINNING of the season; so that the manager has a chance to
> > pound into his players the necessary basic skills in order to play good
> > baseball. Yogi is a great guy, but he is too easy on his players. 
> > FLAME OFF!
> > 
> >      \   /
> >     |\\ / |
> >     | \|  |
> >     |  |\ |
> >     |  | \|
> > 				John B. Lo Coco
> > 				(...whuts!ogre)
> > 				(...szuxn!ogre)
> > 				1-201-467-7436
> 
can you read?????  I said ....,....,Guidry, etc.  Note the "etc."
I never said that the rest of the staff was terrible, you did.

> Also, YOU contradict yourself...."if the yankees had the pitching that the
> o's have...."; what the hell are you talking about, the o's had era over
> 4 this year.  Further, I didn't say that weaver was a bad manager, just that
> he screwed up this season.  And I agree that he probably would have done a better 
> job if he started at the beginning of the season.  And as an aside, I
> happen to think Weaver is indeed a good/great manager.  I do not classify
> martin here because he has no regard for his players future, if it
> should get in the way of his future plans.  I believe (you will vehemently
> disagree) that he knew he didn't want to stay with the A's, so tried to
> make himself look good at any cost, and impress George.  He managed to
do this by pushing his players to the point that permanent injury/burnout
resulted.  
> 
So George is impressed and hires Martin again.

> BUT, is billy your father or something?  I mean, I said that I hated
> billy in my original message....but what's your excuse for loving him?
> Stop thinking with you tiny head up
> your colon every time someone criticizes anything that is remotely connected
> with the yankees, a team which you are in love with obviously.
> 
> And since you took it upon yourself to make this net.flame.....
> SHPX LBH, NFFUBYR!
> 
Oraq bire 'pnhfr Ovyyl jnagf gb tvir vg gb lbh.
> 
> 					Sun_Man