Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site abnji.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!mhuxv!abnji!nyssa
From: nyssa@abnji.UUCP (nyssa of traken)
Newsgroups: net.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Test your Baseball Knowledge
Message-ID: <912@abnji.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Oct-85 06:50:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: abnji.912
Posted: Tue Oct 22 06:50:46 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Oct-85 05:39:17 EDT
References: <635@hou2b.UUCP>
Organization: Terminus Hospital, Incorporated
Lines: 15

There is more to this than meets the eye.  If Mattingly gets an at bat
and no hit, Boggs wins.  However, if Mattingly does get a hit, he is
not assured of the title.  What if the Yankees bat around, and Mattingly
is 1-2 (or worse) in the inning?

If neither gets an at bat, I would assume then that they'd have tied.
I would have no objection to that, and would object to one or the
other winning the batting title for other reasons.
-- 
James C. Armstrong, Jnr.	{ihnp4,cbosgd,akgua}!abnji!nyssa

I'll keep an eye on the old man, he seems to have a knack for getting
himself into trouble!

-who said it, what story?