Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site panda.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!talcott!panda!plw
From: plw@panda.UUCP (Pete Williamson)
Newsgroups: net.sport.hoops
Subject: Re: Dynasty
Message-ID: <982@panda.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 8-Oct-85 14:42:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: panda.982
Posted: Tue Oct  8 14:42:12 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 11-Oct-85 08:11:17 EDT
References: <700@decwrl.UUCP>
Reply-To: plw@panda.UUCP (Pete Williamson)
Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass.
Lines: 21

>
>> 1980	Philadelphia	LA Lakers
>> 1981	Boston		Houston
>> 1982	Philadelphia	LA Lakers
>> 1983	Philadelphia	LA Lakers
>> 1984	Boston		LA Lakers
>> 1985	Boston		LA Lakers
>
>It is dominance such as this which lends creedence to the notion that
>if there is a dynasty in basketball today, it resides in LA.  Don't

Actually, not true. There is a tri-team dominance in the NBA. If Boston
and LA were in the same Division, Philly would be the "Dynasty". Similarly,
if Philly and LA were in the same Division, Boston would be.

In Basketball, you should probably win 11 out of 13 WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS before
you talk about Dynasty. I seem to recall some team back in the sixties did
something like that. Don't seem to remember which one ...
-- 
						Pete Williamson
"By hook or by crook, we will !!" ... #2