Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ttidcb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!ttidca!ttidcb!marvinm
From: marvinm@ttidcb.UUCP (Marvin Moskowitz)
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: Kirk's tombstone in "where no man has gone before"
Message-ID: <487@ttidcb.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 21-Oct-85 21:43:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: ttidcb.487
Posted: Mon Oct 21 21:43:55 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Oct-85 08:16:53 EDT
References: <313@bcsaic.UUCP> <8942@ritcv.UUCP> <17@andromeda.UUCP> <301@graffiti.UUCP>
Reply-To: marvinm@ttidcb.UUCP (Marvin Moskowitz)
Distribution: net
Organization: Transaction Technology, Inc. (CitiCorp), Santa Monica
Lines: 19
Summary: 

In article <301@graffiti.UUCP> steph@graffiti.UUCP (stephanie da silva) writes:
>> > 
>> 
>> Oh come on.... You can't explain everything away. 'Where No Man Has Gone
>> Before' was the first televised episode, before there was any mention of
>> 'James T. Kirk'. It's obvious that they forgot about the middle initial
>> and gave him a new one later.
>
>I distinctly remember watching the first Star Trek episode (so many years ago)
>and the one I recall to be the first was "The Man Trap". (But this was in
>Canada). I thought that "Where No Man Has Gone Before" was the third
>regularly televised episode.

Your memory is correct. WNMHGB was filmed first, but shown later. This
is why the Doctor and uniforms are different, and they use laser rifles
instead of phaser.  The only curious item is that I seem to remember
Spock already refering to Kirk as Jim, which they cooled off for a while

Marv Moskowitz