Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!bellcore!petrus!scherzo!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!vortex!lauren@RAND-UNIX.ARPA
From: lauren@RAND-UNIX.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: code quality
Message-ID: <2001@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 9-Oct-85 01:40:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.2001
Posted: Wed Oct  9 01:40:35 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 11-Oct-85 07:50:16 EDT
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Lines: 10

Frankly, I don't think that much of the code quality we see from places
OTHER than AT&T is all that great either.  Lots of the non-AT&T programs
I've seen posted are horribly written--not all, but LOTS.  But then,
by no means is all AT&T code badly written either.  There's good AND
bad code everywhere.  There are good AND bad programmers everywhere.
Even code that originally was "good" can be ruined down the line
by "bad" programmers who decide to modify ("improve") it, then do it
badly or just plain wrong, and then distribute the result.

--Lauren--