Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site bsdpkh.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!akguc!codas!bsdpkh!latham
From: latham@bsdpkh.UUCP (Ken Latham)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: In sh, is '[' a portable synonym for 'test'?
Message-ID: <115@bsdpkh.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-Oct-85 14:52:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: bsdpkh.115
Posted: Wed Oct 23 14:52:52 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Oct-85 02:36:10 EDT
References: <482@phri.UUCP> <2887@sun.uucp> <313@bdaemon.UUCP> <2908@sun.uucp>
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T-IS (SDSS), Orlando Fl.
Lines: 20

In reference to what I assume was the original question....

	In sh, is ' [ ... ] ' a portable synonym for 'test ... '


The answer ( according to Bell Laboratories ) is NO!

See Unix system V Programmer's manual ( under 'test' )
( it states that SOME unix systems accept this notation )

However, both system V and system V.2 accept it! ( I double checked! )

	I personally do not use it as it tends to mislead some people
into believing that it is an internal function of the shell.

					Yours, ( well may not *yours* )

						Ken Latham

		( signature is in the primordial stages )