Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!lanl!crs
From: crs@lanl.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: More brilliant satire from Ray
Message-ID: <31508@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 7-Oct-85 12:35:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: lanl.31508
Posted: Mon Oct  7 12:35:07 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 9-Oct-85 05:59:46 EDT
References: <11902@rochester.UUCP> <31600146@uiucdcs>
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 24

> First, what you are accusing Richie is not censorship, but quoting out of
> context. Second, it doesn't matter what you were specifically talking about,
> it was your reasoning that was being attacked. All Richie was doing was
> assuming that you are consistent in your reasoning (disgusting -> ban it).
> If what you are trying to tell us is that you are not consistent, I suggest
> that you keep your mouth shut until you have some firm idea of what the hell
> you're talking about (by the way, just in case you don't know, this isn't
> censorship either. Perhaps you should look up the word "censorship" in a
> good dictionary before going on.)
> 
> 			Scott McEwan
> 			{ihnp4,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!mcewan
> 
> "I know what you are. Nut. Screwball. Flake. Lunatic. Fruitcake.
>  Bats in the attic. Psycho. All your dogs aren't barking."

Oh come *on*, now.  Is this kid stuff really necessary?  Isn't the
signal to noise ratio poor enough without this?
-- 
All opinions are mine alone...

Charlie Sorsby
...!{cmcl2,ihnp4,...}!lanl!crs
crs@lanl.arpa