Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site nmtvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!unm-la!unmvax!nmtvax!wildstar
From: wildstar@nmtvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: handwriting
Message-ID: <805@nmtvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 7-Oct-85 20:03:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: nmtvax.805
Posted: Mon Oct  7 20:03:08 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 11-Oct-85 07:05:37 EDT
References: <653@deepthot.UUCP> <>
Reply-To: wildstar@nmtvax.UUCP (Andrew Fine)
Organization: New Mexico Tech, Socorro
Lines: 10


     I think the generalisation that men's handwriting is sloppier than ladies
is too sweeping.  I generally have two kinds of writing... One kind is for
taking notes, a very fast economical font, but it is still readable by anyone.
The other kind is the cursive I was taught in childhood.  I use it rarely,
but it has never degenerated, since I use it for personal letters and
calligraphy, some people say it is really attractive.  So what about two
scripts? One for business, one for pleasure.

 Andrew Fine