Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site uiucdcs
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!mcewan
From: mcewan@uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: More brilliant satire from Ray
Message-ID: <31600150@uiucdcs>
Date: Thu, 10-Oct-85 02:00:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.31600150
Posted: Thu Oct 10 02:00:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Oct-85 16:52:25 EDT
References: <11902@rochester.UUCP>
Lines: 26
Nf-ID: #R:rochester.UUCP:-1190200:uiucdcs:31600150:000:1000
Nf-From: uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU!mcewan    Oct 10 01:00:00 1985


>> First, what you are accusing Richie is not censorship, but quoting out of
>> context. Second, it doesn't matter what you were specifically talking about,
>> it was your reasoning that was being attacked. All Richie was doing was
>> assuming that you are consistent in your reasoning (disgusting -> ban it).
>> If what you are trying to tell us is that you are not consistent, I suggest
>> that you keep your mouth shut until you have some firm idea of what the hell
>> you're talking about (by the way, just in case you don't know, this isn't
>> censorship either. Perhaps you should look up the word "censorship" in a
>> good dictionary before going on.)
>
> Oh come *on*, now.  Is this kid stuff really necessary?  Isn't the
> signal to noise ratio poor enough without this?

I don't understand - what are you objecting to?


			Scott McEwan
			{ihnp4,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!mcewan

"Given a choice, most people would rather not be attacked by
 horrid undersea slime creatures."

"NO!"

"Truth hurts."