Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site nrcvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!psivax!nrcvax!terry
From: terry@nrcvax.UUCP (Terry Grevstad)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: handwriting
Message-ID: <329@nrcvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-Oct-85 02:44:26 EDT
Article-I.D.: nrcvax.329
Posted: Thu Oct 10 02:44:26 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 15-Oct-85 10:34:39 EDT
References: <653@deepthot.UUCP>
Reply-To: terry@nrcvax.UUCP (Terry Grevstad)
Organization: Network Research Research Corp.  Oxnard,CA
Lines: 22
Summary: 

zaphod@deepthot.UUCP (Lance Bailey) says:
>	Why does it SEEM to be a standard rule that the handwriting of women
>is far superiour to that of men?  While a women'n writing is usually quite
>elegant with lovely rounded characters, the scrawl from men's pens is usually
>illegible. Stranger still, while I know of men with "better than average"
>script, I really can't think of any women who get complaints about their
>handwriting.

I do.  Try being a "free" notary public in a busy office and it'll
deteriorate anyone's handwriting *REAL* fast.  After being out of that
job for approximately 5 years now, my handwriting is just coming back
up to "legible".
-- 
\"\t\f1A\h'+1m'\f4\(mo\h'+1m'\f1the\h'+1m'\f4\(es\t\f1\c
_______________________________________________________________________

                                                       Terry Grevstad
                                         Network Research Corporation
                                                   ihnp4!nrcvax!terry
	                 {sdcsvax,hplabs}!sdcrdcf!psivax!nrcvax!terry
                                            ucbvax!calma!nrcvax!terry