Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!ccice2!pwk
From: pwk@ccice2.UUCP (Paul W. Karber)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: "Traditional Values"
Message-ID: <664@ccice2.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 15-Oct-85 21:15:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccice2.664
Posted: Tue Oct 15 21:15:54 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Oct-85 06:45:14 EDT
References: <274@fear.UUCP> <5798@tektronix.UUCP> <2722@ihuxf.UUCP>
Reply-To: pwk@ccice2.UUCP (Paul W. Karber)
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 21

In article <2722@ihuxf.UUCP> features@ihuxf.UUCP (aMAZon) writes:

>	You're absolutely right about most marriages being based
>on economic grounds.  A daughter was looked upon as another
>commodity, like a cow or a goat.

Are you trying to say that in the past people did not love their
child unless it was male?  Or are you trying to say that in the
past people loved their cows and goats. :-)
Let's just say that in the past people often unfairly valued
male children more then female.  But we'll change that. :-)

>aMAZon @ AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL; ihnp4!ihuxf!features
>					 *open to possibilities*
                                          ^^^^ ^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You could be wrong?
-- 

Of course I could be wrong.

siesmo!rochester!ccice5!ccice2!pwk