Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucsfcgl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!mce
From: mce@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Mark McEntee%CGL)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: The good ol' days when there was no sexual molestation
Message-ID: <674@ucsfcgl.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 20-Oct-85 17:58:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucsfcgl.674
Posted: Sun Oct 20 17:58:07 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 22-Oct-85 04:51:06 EDT
References: <732@utai.UUCP> <909@utcs.uucp> <668@ucsfcgl.UUCP> <505@scirtp.UUCP>
Reply-To: mce@ucsfcgl.UUCP (Mark McEntee)
Organization: UCSF Computer Graphics Lab
Lines: 18

In article <505@scirtp.UUCP> todd@scirtp.UUCP (Todd Jones) writes (in
response to an article of mine, which the first paragraph is a part of):
>> violent porn is the DOMINANT reason
>> for some people going out and raping and cutting, or cutting and raping as
>> the case may be (heard about a weird, grotesque case in W. Germany in which
>> the order mattered.  Write to me for details.).  
>
>Yup, it ain't like the days of yore before porn was everywhere.
>Back in them good ol' days women never got raped or abused.
>Yesiree, everything was hunky dunky dory. Since you think like
>me, why don't you give these good people the statistics I forgot
>to bring along. :->.

  You buffoon!  What I said [in reply to a letter of Alan Rosenthal's] was
that he was mistaken in believing that "violent porn is the DOMINANT..." etc.

  Did you not read the entire article?  At least I like your phrase, "hunky
dunky dory"...