Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rochester.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!seismo!rochester!ray
From: ray@rochester.UUCP (Ray Frank)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Just a couple of thoughts on Pornography
Message-ID: <12506@rochester.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 21-Oct-85 08:45:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: rocheste.12506
Posted: Mon Oct 21 08:45:14 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 24-Oct-85 00:22:58 EDT
References: <732@utai.UUCP> <909@utcs.uucp> <504@scirtp.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Rochester, CS Dept.
Lines: 15

> > In article <732@utai.UUCP> gkloker@utai.UUCP (Geoff Loker) writes:
> > >     What might be a good idea is setting up some central locations where
> > >"dirty" magazines, movies, etc, are available.  These locations would be the
> > >*only* places where they would be sold, and they would sell *only* such
> > >items.  This plan has the virtue that people who are offended by pornography
> > >would never have to go near these places, and people who like it would not
> > >have their supply cut off.  Comments?
> 
> YOU STILL HAVEN'T DEFINED PORNOGRAPHY, FRIENDS!
> 
It's in the dictionary, look it up.  If porn was not defined, then it wouldn't
be in the dictionary, in fact, it wouldn't be a word.  All this talk of porn
being in the bible and if you censored porn most of the bible would be censored
as well is pure unintelligible garbage.  Porn is porn is porn period.  As you
can see, I don't feel like playing semantics today.