Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!mhuxt!mhuxv!akgua!gatech!seismo!lll-crg!ucdavis!ucbvax!info-vax
From: sasaki@HARVARD.HARVARD.EDU (Marty Sasaki)
Newsgroups: mod.computers.vax
Subject: Re:  Security
Message-ID: <8511161514.AA18982@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 15-Nov-85 21:47:38 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8511161514.AA18982
Posted: Fri Nov 15 21:47:38 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Nov-85 06:33:05 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 16
Approved: info-vax@sri-kl.arpa

The problem with SPR's and Software dispatches, and the TSC is that
you have to pay for all of these things. At times I find it enraging
to have to pay money to tell DEC that there is a bug in a system that
I (or my company) have (has) already paid lots of money for. The TSC
has only been useful to me once. This mailing list is useful to me at
least once a week.

I still don't feel very good about having a separate security list.
Like I said before, I don't read this list from a VMS system but from
a (relatively flakey) UNIX system. I wouldn't trust secure mail into
this system.

I feel even worse about having security holes published to this list.
I still think that there is a dilemma.

		Marty Sasaki