Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site uvicctr.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!uvicctr!collinge
From: collinge@uvicctr.UUCP (Doug Collinge)
Newsgroups: net.video,net.analog
Subject: Re: Adding Video Input to a TV Receiver
Message-ID: <158@uvicctr.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Nov-85 16:10:16 EST
Article-I.D.: uvicctr.158
Posted: Fri Nov 22 16:10:16 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 25-Nov-85 06:44:10 EST
References: <6263@amdcad.UUCP> <743@hou2e.UUCP> <590@ttrdc.UUCP>
Reply-To: collinge@uvicctr.UUCP (Doug Collinge)
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria B.C. Canada
Lines: 31
Keywords: TV VCR
Xref: watmath net.video:1690 net.analog:538
Summary: 

>>> I would like to add a Video input to my Sears 19 inch TV receiver,
>>> to obtain better pictures from my VCR.
>>> ----Ramesh
>>   The main reason why TV sets don't have a video input is that they
>>don't have an AC transformer in the power supply.
>>		Giovanni Vannucci
>
>Mightn't it be possible to isolate the video connection, rather than
>the entire set?
>       dan levy | yvel nad 

	So we'll isolate the video with a transformer - whoops
the necessary transformer will be too big, bulky, and expensive. 
Hmmm.  Aha! We'll use a cheap little transformer and run it at high
frequency!  So we need a modulator opstream and a demodulator
downstream...
	Wait!  My TV already has a demodulator and my VCR already has a
modulator so we can do it for FREE!!!

	Huh?  Why are we doing this again?!?

Doug !-)

-- 
		Doug Collinge
		School of Music, University of Victoria,
		PO Box 1700, Victoria, B.C.,
		Canada,  V8W 2Y2  
		decvax!nrl-css!uvicctr!collinge
		decvax!uw-beaver!uvicctr!collinge
		ubc-vision!uvicctr!collinge