Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site humming.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!humming!arturo
From: arturo@humming.UUCP (Arturo Perez)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.unix-wizards,net.lan,net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.os
Message-ID: <101@humming.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 15-Nov-85 18:45:31 EST
Article-I.D.: humming.101
Posted: Fri Nov 15 18:45:31 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 16-Nov-85 20:59:18 EST
References: <2466@sjuvax.UUCP> <1594@utcsri.UUCP> <783@cyb-eng.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Kurzweil A.I.
Lines: 11
Xref: watmath net.arch:2094 net.unix-wizards:15739 net.lan:1152 net.news.group:4564
Summary: Yes, let's see net.os!

In article <783@cyb-eng.UUCP>, bc@cyb-eng.UUCP (Bill Crews) writes:
> > I feel we need a net.os to discuss operating system topics.  Right now
> > this is spread all over the net, mainly in heavily used groups like
> > unix-wizards.  Unix isn't everything, and even there it would be nice to
> > have a discussion not buried by discussion of bugs, etc.
> > 
> > I said all this a couple of months ago, got about thirty responses,
> > only to be told "you didn't go about it the right way", which I think
> > is a little crazy to be told after the fact.  I now understand that the
> > right way to do it is to swamp the net.  So if you want net.os, use your
> > 'f' (not 'F') key NOW!