Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site geowhiz.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!uwvax!geowhiz!larry
From: larry@geowhiz.UUCP (Larry McVoy)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: Asynchronous State machines
Message-ID: <295@geowhiz.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 20-Nov-85 03:54:20 EST
Article-I.D.: geowhiz.295
Posted: Wed Nov 20 03:54:20 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 23-Nov-85 00:18:56 EST
Reply-To: larry@geowhiz.UUCP (Larry McVoy)
Organization: UW Madison, Geology Dept.
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.arch:2130 net.micro.68k:1349

In article <5841@tekecs.UUCP> johnt@tekecs.UUCP (John Theus) writes:
>Let me speak with some recent production design experience with asynchronous
>state machines (ASMs).
>For my money, it is hard to beat a properly designed ASM.  On the projects
>we recently completed, the Tek 6200 series of workstations, the compute
			    ^^^^^^^^

You may correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Tek just drop this
series of workstations?
-- 
Larry McVoy						+----------------+
							| Slower traffic |
Arpa:	mcvoy@rsch.wisc.edu				|   keep right	 |
Uucp:	{seismo, ihnp4}!uwvax!geowhiz!geophiz!larry	+----------------+