Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ecn-pc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!ecn-pc!mdm
From: mdm@ecn-pc.UUCP (Mike D McEvoy)
Newsgroups: net.arch
Subject: Re: Challenge to Intel
Message-ID: <436@ecn-pc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 5-Dec-85 12:46:42 EST
Article-I.D.: ecn-pc.436
Posted: Thu Dec  5 12:46:42 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Dec-85 04:49:16 EST
References: <965@homxb.UUCP>
Reply-To: mdm@ecn-pc.UUCP (Mike D McEvoy)
Organization: Cybotech Product Development Lab
Lines: 18

In article <965@homxb.UUCP> gemini@homxb.UUCP (Rick Richardson) writes:
>I challenge you folks at Intel to back up your announcement with
>a dhrystone run.  Do it soon, and send the results directly to me.
>I'll protect anonymity if so desired.
>Rick Richardson, PC Research, Inc. (201) 922-1134

I've sent requests to several Intel folks to do the same thing...
No response.  I know that new product introduction causes a loss of
sleep, but alot of potential customers (read that real money) are
interested in the Dhrystones, as well as floating point performance
with the new 386/Weitek 1163/1164/1165 co-processor vs the 68020/68881.

How about some results?????

Mike McEvoy
317-497-0509