Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site wucec2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mgnetp!we53!busch!wucs!wucec2!rll9466
From: rll9466@wucec2.UUCP (Richard L. Lantz)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Nasty words about the 300ZX
Message-ID: <1204@wucec2.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 20-Nov-85 00:15:55 EST
Article-I.D.: wucec2.1204
Posted: Wed Nov 20 00:15:55 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 21-Nov-85 07:18:07 EST
References: <876@whuxlm.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Washington U. in St. Louis, Engineering School
Lines: 9
Summary: Gee, I thought that's what was said about most Z-cars...

In article <876@whuxlm.UUCP>, hhc@whuxlm.UUCP (Chefitz Harry H) writes:
> 
> 	"The 300ZX isn't in the same class as the 944 and RX-7.
> 	 Personally, I don't consider it to be a real sports car."
> 					-Rod Millen

With the possible exception of the early 240Z, the only opinions I've heard
with regard to Z-cars is that they sometimes had good acceleration, but wallowed
through the corners.  I will emphasize that I do *NOT* speak from experience.