Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy,net.bio
Subject: Re: Biology vs Mechanism
Message-ID: <2186@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Nov-85 19:36:53 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.2186
Posted: Fri Nov 22 19:36:53 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 24-Nov-85 04:29:07 EST
References: <2040@pyuxd.UUCP> <2153@umcp-cs.UUCP> <2120@pyuxd.UUCP> <2212@umcp-cs.UUCP> <2144@pyuxd.UUCP> <666@spar.UUCP>
Organization: Whatever we're calling ourselves this week
Lines: 22
Xref: watmath net.philosophy:3208 net.bio:314

Michael Ellis acting "grown up":

>      Do you ever read?
> 
>     Since you will not be either scientific or logical, and since you will
>     furthermore not admit that your arguments are based on pure faith (which
>     Charles has the honesty to admit, when required), I wonder why you even
>     bother to submit such rubbish to net.philosophy.


Michael Ellis acting "robotic" and predictably deterministic:

>     Beep beep!

>     A world based on the laws that you prefer would be a most dreary
>     and mechanical place indeed. 

Sorry you feel that way and choose to invent another one of your own design
that you won't find so dreary.
-- 
Popular consensus says that reality is based on popular consensus.
						Rich Rosen   pyuxd!rlr