Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site cdstar.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!talcott!wjh12!cdstar!sanford
From: sanford@cdstar.UUCP (Conrad Sanford)
Newsgroups: net.cog-eng
Subject: Re: Iconic interfaces for office systems based on video games
Message-ID: <199@cdstar.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 19-Nov-85 23:41:59 EST
Article-I.D.: cdstar.199
Posted: Tue Nov 19 23:41:59 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 21-Nov-85 04:46:07 EST
References: <549@calgary.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Cambridge Digital Systems - Cambridge, MA
Lines: 36
Summary: A psychological comment on user interfaces




> Abstract: Although users are enthusiastic about modern icon-based
> interfaces using direct-manipulation principles (Shneiderman, 1983), we
> argue that their full potential has not yet been realized. Specifically,
> certain aspects of video-games are mergeable with conventional icon
> systems (Malone, 1982), providing "players" with an exciting way of
> getting their work done.



	While this interface model is an admirable motivational 
technology, I would like to point out one of the long-term considerations
that seems relevant, if not imparitive. This being the type of emotional
involvement implicitly engineering into the user interface.

	The video-game model raises a specific question that points 
to a more general one. Specifics first: Is it appropriate to increase
a user's emotional involvement with a model that is filled with conflict?
We should take it for granted that the psychological tool in making this
form of interface a motivating one is the increased emotional involvement.
What is striking is it's use of gods and devils, and the use of weapons 
and defenses. Previously purely intellectual tasks become tinted with
some form of the potential for winning and very subtle personal
identification with the characters of this model.

	The more general problem is thus: it seems likely that some
eventual user interface will rely heavily on the user's emotional
involvement, as well as his intellectual skills. I suspect that this
will go beyond simple motivation, having an greater effect on his 
skill level. What factors should be implicit in *any* user interface
model that would be of psychological and/or social benefit to the
user?

	I welcome any responses to these comments. Please post.