Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site princeton.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!jsl
From: jsl@princeton.UUCP (Jong Lee)
Newsgroups: net.games,net.wanted.sources
Subject: Re: noughts and crosses
Message-ID: <1173@princeton.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 25-Nov-85 00:18:24 EST
Article-I.D.: princeto.1173
Posted: Mon Nov 25 00:18:24 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 25-Nov-85 08:14:57 EST
References: <5933@tektronix.UUCP> <2003@bmcg.UUCP>
Organization: Princeton University EECS Dept
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.games:2352 net.wanted.sources:1566

> Go is more complex than "getting five in a row" I agree. But since
...
> of your markers in a straight line you win. The same bottom line 
> as in Go.
> 
> Bob Nebert---------------sdcsvax!bmcg!bobn

wait, are you saying that in Go, you win by getting five in a row?
I hope not.  The object in Go is to capture as much of the 19x19
board as possible, with various handicapping to the players, etc.
the real name to naughts and crosses is omok.

jsl@princeton
*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***