Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site wucec2.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mgnetp!we53!busch!wucs!wucec2!rll9466 From: rll9466@wucec2.UUCP (Richard L. Lantz) Newsgroups: net.games.frp Subject: Re: illusions Message-ID: <1222@wucec2.UUCP> Date: Fri, 29-Nov-85 12:36:05 EST Article-I.D.: wucec2.1222 Posted: Fri Nov 29 12:36:05 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 30-Nov-85 06:39:37 EST References: <9064@ritcv.UUCP> <1735@uwmacc.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Washington U. in St. Louis, Engineering School Lines: 13 In article <1735@uwmacc.UUCP>, oyster@uwmacc.UUCP (Vicious Oyster) writes: > > > In the discussion of the "reality" of illusions, I still can't justify one > aspect in my mind. If you accept that an illusionist can cast a bridge over > a chasm, and PCs and NPCs who believe it is there can actually walk across on > the illusion of the bridge, what of the logical inverse of the idea? That is, > if an illusionist casts an illusion over a mountain range, making it appear not > to be there, could I, the unsuspecting dumb fighter-type walk right through it? > It would seem to be consistent, but that, to me, is stretching things a bit. > I would assume that to accomplish such a massive illusion would take an Illustionist of a high (skill) level. Not just any 1st level fella could do it.