Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site hadron.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rlgvax!hadron!jsdy
From: jsdy@hadron.UUCP (Joseph S. D. Yao)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: break, continue, return, goto
Message-ID: <73@hadron.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 16-Nov-85 15:23:41 EST
Article-I.D.: hadron.73
Posted: Sat Nov 16 15:23:41 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Nov-85 07:55:52 EST
References: <771@whuxl.UUCP> <9500029@iuvax.UUCP> <806@whuxl.UUCP>
Reply-To: jsdy@hadron.UUCP (Joseph S. D. Yao)
Organization: Hadron, Inc., Fairfax, VA
Lines: 15
Keywords: For Fortran-lovers only; the rest of us will meet at the bar.
Summary: If you really WANT a counter-only for, then ...

In article <806@whuxl.UUCP> mike@whuxl.UUCP (BALDWIN) writes:
>>   In addition, I recommend the use of for loop be restricted to 
>> its original meaning in natural language, i.e. as a loop with simple 
>> counter.
[Note ">>": second attribution was missing.]

#define dofor(var,init,lim,incr)	\
		for (var = init; var < lim; lim += incr)
#define dofor1(var,init,lim)	for(var = init; var < lim; var++)

etc.  Just don't present me with any code using these macros.  Now
can we discuss something real?
-- 

	Joe Yao		hadron!jsdy@seismo.{CSS.GOV,ARPA,UUCP}