Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Loop "Equivalencies"
Message-ID: <6156@utzoo.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 20-Nov-85 14:55:48 EST
Article-I.D.: utzoo.6156
Posted: Wed Nov 20 14:55:48 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Nov-85 14:55:48 EST
References: <10200026@ada-uts.UUCP>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
Lines: 13

> I'd like to point out what I think is a bug in Kernighan & Ritchie.
> ...[equivalence of "for" to "while"]... 
> This is not true if "statement" is a block which contains a "continue"
> since, in the first case, "expr3", is executed after the continue but
> is not in the second case.
> ...
> Am I missing something?

Only a more up-to-date C Reference Manual, actually.  Yes, this was a bug
in K&R, and it has been corrected in more recent editions of the CRM.
-- 
				Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
				{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry