Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site riccb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!riccb!rjnoe
From: rjnoe@riccb.UUCP (Roger J. Noe)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Loop "Equivalencies"
Message-ID: <585@riccb.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 20-Nov-85 09:07:00 EST
Article-I.D.: riccb.585
Posted: Wed Nov 20 09:07:00 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 21-Nov-85 07:20:31 EST
References: <10200026@ada-uts.UUCP>
Organization: Rockwell International - Downers Grove, IL
Lines: 28

> In Appendix A (C Reference Manual), p. 202, and p. 56, it says that
> the following:
> 
>     for (expr1; expr2; expr3)
>         statement
> 
> is equivalent to:
> 
>     expr1;
>     while (expr2) {
>         statement
>         expr3;
>     }
> 
> This is not true if "statement" is a block which contains a "continue"
>
> Am I missing something?
> -- Rich Wagner

Nope, you're exactly right.  It should be this way:
	expr1;
	while(expr2) {
		statement
	contin:	expr3;
	}
and should refer to the continue statement a few sections later in appendix A.
--
Roger Noe			ihnp4!riccb!rjnoe