Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site graffiti.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!graffiti!peter
From: peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: Proposed pornography ordinance
Message-ID: <448@graffiti.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 17-Nov-85 21:50:24 EST
Article-I.D.: graffiti.448
Posted: Sun Nov 17 21:50:24 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 19-Nov-85 05:47:38 EST
References: <39400010@uiucdcs> <336@mb2c.UUCP>
Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX
Lines: 12

> > The following is a definition of pornography taken from a proposed
> > anti-pornography ordinance

As well as the previously mentioned objections, it should be possible to
create works which are clearly pornographic that do not fall under the
purview of the definition. I will leave the details as an a excersize 
for the reader.
-- 
Name: Peter da Silva
Graphic: `-_-'
UUCP: ...!shell!{graffiti,baylor}!peter
IAEF: ...!kitty!baylor!peter