Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site aicchi.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!aicchi!mdb From: mdb@aicchi.UUCP (Blackwell) Newsgroups: net.micro.16k Subject: Re: Gee, 68k lovers in .16k; DSI news and optimizer Message-ID: <627@aicchi.UUCP> Date: Fri, 6-Dec-85 11:15:49 EST Article-I.D.: aicchi.627 Posted: Fri Dec 6 11:15:49 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 7-Dec-85 05:26:11 EST References: <136@utastro.UUCP> Reply-To: mdb@aicchi.UUCP (Blackwell) Organization: Analysts International Corp; Chicago Branch Lines: 50 Keywords: DSI-32 UNIX SYSV UPGRADE Summary: Where'd you here Version 7 ???, etc In article <136@utastro.UUCP> jk@utastro.UUCP (John Krist) writes: > > > The UNIX being tested is Version 7. > I have been talking with the company doing the Unix port for Definicon, and they assure me it is System V r2. I have some literature about it (I know... what does that prove?...:-), and it looks real nice. It is based on National Semi's validated port called System V/Series 3200. I also have the manuals for the Unix, sanz a few update pages for the DSI-32. These are AT&T manuals with updates for the 32k and DSI-32. > You need a ICU and MMU to run it. As far as new chips go, you will need *specific revisions* of the CPU and MMU. These, for all practical purposes, will be available only through Definicon as an upgrade package. This because the chips needed are still in limited production. I tried to get them through the NS & TI Distributers with no success. No word yet as to whether there will be a cost for the upgrade. > ( I don't see the need for UNIX when the MSDOS shell is fine. ) This all depends on what your idea of fine is. If you just want to run one thing real fast (*not* a bad idea!) the MSDOS shell *is* just fine. However, if you have a need for concurrent tasks, its another story. The people at Definicon swear by DRIs Concurrent CPM/ DOS. However, my experience has shown several fatal (for me)flaws in CCPM. The main one is that CCPM does not work with the Cartridge Drives I have installed in my system. DRI ackowledges this, but has no fix or explanation, though one of their techs said something about buffers not being flushed. > > For those who seem sick and tired of me talking about this on the net, > I am just excited about the product and impressed with what it offers > for the price. > > Ready and waiting, > John Krist > U. Texas Astronomy Dept. > (jk@utastro.UUCP) I agree, lets here some more from DSI-32 owners! Anybody got some nifty code they want to share? How about ideas for *using* all this power, now that we've got it? Even queries on how to do things... Lets hear from you! Mike Blackwell mdb@aicchi.UUCP (..ihnp4!aicchi!mdb)