Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site pedsgd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!petsd!pedsgd!bobh
From: bobh@pedsgd.UUCP (Bob Halloran)
Newsgroups: net.micro.68k,net.news.group,net.micro.6809
Subject: Re: Can the OS-9 traffic move out of net.micro.68K?
Message-ID: <358@pedsgd.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 18-Nov-85 08:11:10 EST
Article-I.D.: pedsgd.358
Posted: Mon Nov 18 08:11:10 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 19-Nov-85 04:17:30 EST
References: <5100002@umn-cs.UUCP> <257@l5.uucp> <500@harvard.ARPA> <1214@cbdkc1.UUCP> <6433@amdcad.UUCP>
Organization: CONCURRENT Computer Corp, Tinton Falls, NJ
Lines: 23
Xref: watmath net.micro.68k:1331 net.news.group:4598 net.micro.6809:617

In article <6433@amdcad.UUCP> phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) writes:
>In article <1214@cbdkc1.UUCP> daleske@dkc1.UUCP ( John Daleske x4335 3E296 RAA) writes:
>>First, state which OS to you is "real" and why.  Perhaps we should
>>petition for forming net.os and discuss it there.
>
>This is easy. State the OS that you are reading this msg on, the OS
>whose supporters pay many thousands of dollars per site per month to
>move such msgs around. Now explain to them what they get out of
>moving your irritating OS-9 traffic around.

Since not all of the microcomputers in the marketplace can (or care to)
support Unix, are you then suggesting the removal of net.micro.cpm, pc,
mac, ...... ?  I consider your thinking remarkably parochial.

					Bob Halloran
					Sr MTS, CONCURRENT Computer Corp
					(Formerly Perkin-Elmer DSG)
=============================================================================
UUCP: {decvax, ucbvax, most Action Central}!vax135\
		       	 {pesnta, topaz, princeton}!petsd!pedsgd!bobh 
USPS: 106 Apple St M/S 305, Tinton Falls NJ 07724	DDD: (201) 758-7000
Disclaimer: I doubt that my employer wants anything to do with my opinions.
Quote: "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro..." -- Hunter Thompson